Post B70JomPEjfu24RThVA by lizzie@brain.worm.pink
 (DIR) More posts by lizzie@brain.worm.pink
 (DIR) Post #B70Joj2RFysrcrmx3A by lizzie@brain.worm.pink
       2026-06-04T16:57:56.812530Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       tbh you could probably make a waylandy wrapper for every windowing system for portability. the downside is that wayland client code ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
       
 (DIR) Post #B70JokJUW47Pa2m5Gi by ophis@brain.worm.pink
       2026-06-04T22:18:45.882952Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lizzie what the hell even was the point of wayland anyway i still don't know what i'm missing
       
 (DIR) Post #B70JolKwi8sOkqSlAu by lizzie@brain.worm.pink
       2026-06-04T22:55:01.536809Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ophis versatility, security, not having to deal with x’s weird architectural decisions.if an environment is like a kiosk or something then the application cannot control the size of its windows, and wayland makes this explicit. not everything sees everything else so no keyloggers and stuff. rendering the desktop itself is a more straightforward process as well since what gets rendered is managed by one program instead of a conversation between multiple
       
 (DIR) Post #B70JomPEjfu24RThVA by lizzie@brain.worm.pink
       2026-06-04T22:56:37.862838Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ophis the downside is its kind of an unbiased blank slate and so doing literally anything requires a lot of boilerplate
       
 (DIR) Post #B70Jvmd4IwqGn1HsJc by KaiserKitty@clubcyberia.co
       2026-06-04T23:01:03.565344Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @lizzie @ophis it was also built on the assumption that user devices would not be standardized as sort of an overcorrection from Xorg being designed for one specific use case and being bludgeoned into many others.