Post AZGVZSgFKgo3how0Ho by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
 (DIR) More posts by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
 (DIR) Post #AZGVZQcyxr0VL7OMvA by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
       2023-08-30T08:36:09Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Is there a certification or norm or standard or protocol or #RFC or something else describing a light web based on a subset of #html  where css and javascript would be excluded ?Sites following this could be viewed by classical web browser and by "light" browser (knowing only this subset)#smolnet
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGVZSgFKgo3how0Ho by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
       2023-08-30T08:38:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Something like QT's supported subset :https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/richtext-html-subset.html
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGVZVELqrH9cAuGiu by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
       2023-08-30T08:41:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       What about that @aral ?https://mastodon.tetaneutral.net/@adele/110977651155152132I'm sure you have a relevant point of view🙏
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGVehRbrtCwwXaP5s by pulkomandy@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
       2023-08-30T11:28:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wakame @adele there is also an "xhtml basic" version of xhtml that removes a lot of unneeded things but still enables css. I think the 1.0 version of that spec is better, in version 1.1 they added javascript and inline styles and other things that don't really help.So, for a modern approach ignoring pre-css browsers, that could work toohttps://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml-basic-20001219/It may be a good compromise to keep things nice and "modern" while still allowing old devices. I think I can adjust my website easily
       
 (DIR) Post #AZGVjTFo3Te0NeL9n6 by adele@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
       2023-08-30T11:05:00Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @wakame Nowadays, hardware resources of our devices are essentially used to manage bloated websites.If we can incite actors to return to a lighter web or #smolweb, small devices (old pc, old smartphones, retro-machines, small boards...) could be usable.Promoting a standard, also compatible with actual browsers, would be virtuous.#Gemini and #gopher are not reasonable options, but something with forms, tables, colours and all that html 3.2 proposes is.@pulkomandy