Subj : Re: Proxmox clustering To : Meatlotion From : deon Date : Tue Dec 29 2020 10:02:15 Re: Re: Proxmox clustering By: StackFault to MeaTLoTioN on Mon Dec 28 2020 08:34 am Howdy, St> Clustered virtualization is a science in itself so it works the way you St> intend it to work. Also, make a lot of testing before putting something in "prod". Try disconnecting stuff, St> shutdown hosts, etc and see if it behaves like you want it to do... I agree, it is. It depends on your goals - if you are doing this just for the heck of it (and to learn :) then awesome. But if you are wanting to make an "application" highly available, then docker/kube is the way to go. Still a learning curve, but the environment takes care of most of the requirements and you can use commodity hardware. You still need a shared storage environment, that can span multiple hosts (and those hosts can be virtual) - which is where glusterfs (I found problematic, and I am not sure of its development status), ceph, NFS, etc can help. I would prefer gluster/ceph over NFS, since "NFS" is not HA and when it goes down it takes everything with it (never been a fan of NFS). Personally I use a commercial software package that provides HA storage (because I work for the company that makes it, and I can put it down to skills :) With it nodes providing the storage can go offline, as long as there are a major of nodes still active and atleast 1 of thoses nodes with the filesystem. On my intel server, I use VMware to make multiple VMs and use the commercial software for docker, but for the Pi, I'll still use VMware to make multiple guests and play with gluster again. ....лоеп .... Hindsight is an exact science. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (1337:2/101) .