Subj : Re: Going all in on IPv6? To : deon From : MeaTLoTioN Date : Fri Jan 28 2022 13:54:09 On 28 Jan 2022, deon said the following... de> Howdy, de> de> Has anybody who has IPv6 thought about ditching IPv4? I'm very tempted de> to do it. The thought had crossed my mind, but I was unsure about how this would affect general internet use if I were no longer being able to access IPv4 addy's. This has answered that question. de> * Using a /96 from your network, it can map that to IPv4 address, so de> that that IPv6 clint can talk to an IPv4 system. It's all done in de> kernel space, but it essentially proxies the connection. Interesting, seems like a neat idea and way of doing it. de> * For the reverse, where you have a service (eg: a BBS) and you want IPv4 de> clients to connect to your BBS with only an IPv6 address. It's de> also done in kernel space, but it essentially is the same as NAT. de> de> I guess for IPv4 connections, there is an additional hop and probably de> some latency, but for IPv6 to IPv6 connections its not part of the de> path, so you get your line speed. de> de> I'll throw some more load at it and see how it handles more pressure. What is the benefit of going all out IPv6? And what is a draw back of using both IPv6 and IPv4? --- |14Best regards, |11Ch|03rist|11ia|15n |11a|03ka |11Me|03aTLoT|11io|15N |07ÄÄ |08[|10eml|08] |15ml@erb.pw |07ÄÄ |08[|10web|08] |15www.erb.pw |07ÄÄÄ¿ |07ÄÄ |08[|09fsx|08] |1521:1/158 |07ÄÄ |08[|11tqw|08] |151337:1/101 |07ÂÄÄÙ |07ÄÄ |08[|12rtn|08] |1580:774/81 |07ÄÂ |08[|14fdn|08] |152:250/5 |07ÄÄÄÙ |07ÄÄ |08[|10ark|08] |1510:104/2 |07ÄÙ .... There are three kinds of people: Those who can count, and those who can't --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/13 (Linux/64) * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (1337:1/101) .