Subj : Re: netmail, from address
To   : alterego
From : MeaTLoTioN
Date : Tue Aug 25 2020 10:14:08

On 22 Aug 2020, alterego said the following...
 
 al>   Re: Re: netmail, from address
 al>   By: MeaTLoTioN to alterego on Fri Aug 21 2020 02:16 pm
 al> 
 al>  al>> I think its a bug with Mystic. Send me a netmail and I'll be able to
 al>  al>> confirm it...
 al> 
 al> Oh, and I probably should be clearer - I think its a presentation bug -
 al> it doesnt affect the delivery of Netmail (TTBOMK)..
 al> 
 al> ...ëîåï
 al> 
 al> ... Extreme boredom serves to cure boredom.
 al> --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
 al>  * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (1337:2/101)

I noticed that in the kludge of the netmails that is sent from hpt, there is
no "@MSGID:" header line, that line is what Mystic will uses to know the
node address of the sender right? The reason I see the HUB node address when
the MSGID line is missing, is maybe because the line is missing so Mystic
just uses the HUB node address instead as that was the last node it passed
through?

This is entirely speculation, but makes sense in my head, but I wonder why
the MSGID header is missing from hpt messages? does that need to be
configured somehow in the hpt config that is just missing for this one node?

What do you think Deon?

---
|14Best regards,
|11Ch|03rist|11ia|15n |11a|03ka |11Me|03aTLoT|11io|15N

|07ÄÄ |08[|10eml|08] |15ml@erb.pw |07ÄÄ |08[|10web|08] |15www.erb.pw |07ÄÄÄ¿
|07ÄÄ |08[|09fsx|08]  |1521:1/158 |07ÄÄ |08[|11tqw|08] |151337:1/101 |07ÂÄÄÙ
|07ÄÄ |08[|12rtn|08] |1580:774/81 |07ÄÂ |08[|14fdn|08] |152:250/5 |07ÄÄÄÙ
|07ÄÄ |08[|10ark|08]  |1510:104/2 |07ÄÙ

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/02 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (1337:1/101)

.