Subj : Re: Banned
To   : Mike Powell
From : Jas Hud
Date : Thu May 02 2024 19:24:29

  To: Mike Powell
  Re: Re: Banned
  By: Mike Powell to DIGIMAUS on Wed May 01 2024 08:22 am

 > From Newsgroup: micronet.comp
 >
 > > What's funny is that I have port 22 wide open and interestingly enough,
 > > the rest of my filters are empty:
 >
 > > {'recidive-subnet': ['163.47.39.0', '129.226.147.0', '43.134.118.0',
 > > '154.16.56.0', '192.144.65.0', '43.163.237.0', '124.156.223.0',
 > > '43.130.42.0', '43.163.214.0', '43.134.111.0', '20.197.49.0']}
 >
 > > Almost all of the above are from Chinese ISPs.
 >
 > Many of mine are from China also.  When I had 22 open I noticed that the
 > scripts hit that port (SSH) a *lot* harder than the standard telnet port.
 > I found that interesting since SSH is encrypted but, then again, most IoT
 > devices are probably more likely to have an SSH port open vs. a telnet port.
 >
 > Mike

i've been running servers for so long i don't even pay attention to that stuff unless it's intelligent or causing harm. i took over datastream from a dead ssyop and he had MD and he tried every online scheme to make money and that caused a lot of traffic over the years.
--- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
 *  bbses.info - http://bbses.info - telnet://bbses.info
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1)

.