Subj : Bluetooth To : Ky Moffet From : Barry Martin Date : Wed Mar 27 2024 07:29:00 Hi Ky! > > Don't want Wi-Fi because don't think it is secure enuf to keep peepers w > KM> I don't know why Bluetooth would be any more secure. > I was initially thinking of limited range (~33 feet) but the new BT5.0 > has a range up to 800 feet. KM> Eeep! In one way better range has definite positives: pair one's BT outdoor speaker with the music system inside the house -- maybe apartment as 800 feet is approximately eight stories. Negative is more possibilities of someone snagging the device, more interference in the band because of the additional range. > As for security, doesn't one have to pair during a limited time? It > seems if not paired within the allocated period it doesn't connect. > (This is a sort of a 'statement-question' as I'm not sure.) KM> This seems to be device-specific (or more likely OS-specific). KM> Some will cycle off again, others sit there waiting forever. Seems a timeout would make more sense: save battery power comes to mind (transmitting the "hello out there!" signal takes energy). KM> And sometimes the BT keyboard disconnects from the phone after KM> not being used for a few days, but yesterday I found it was still KM> paired even tho it hadn't been used in a couple months. Wonder if it does a periodic check to see if the paired device is still lin range? ...As soon as I typed that thought that wouldn't make sense as the phone travels and might be out of range for several hours. Of course could allowed to miss a few 'you out there?' checks... Probably more once paired always paired. ¯ ® ¯ BarryMartin3@MyMetronet.NET ® ¯ ® .... Half of a large intestine: 1 semicolon --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47 þ wcECHO 4.2 ÷ ILink: The Safe BBS þ Bettendorf, IA --- QScan/PCB v1.20a / 01-0462 * Origin: ILink: CFBBS | cfbbs.no-ip.com | 856-933-7096 (454:1/1) .