Subj : Re: PING Question To : Barry Martin From : Nancy Backus Date : Sat Jul 11 2020 00:46:44 -=> Quoting Barry Martin to Nancy Backus on 01-Jul-2020 09:05 <=- BM>> Just another reason for one to know what his or her normals are. Like BM>> when my pulse rate was definitely too rapid - that was caught at the BM>> doctor's office. There could be a few reasons so let's not panic and BM>> prescribe something quite yet. Monitored for a couple/few months, BM>> didn't get much better so not due to a transient factor. ...OK, I've BM>> convinced myself it's not a short term health quirk and so let's go BM>> ahead with the detailed checking. NB>> Right... don't want to treat unnecessarily, but also don't want to NB>> ignore a true problem... Saw my GYN last week, BP was normal enough NB>> there, so added it to the list for my PCP to see... ;) BM> Yes: white coat syndrome, slight anxiety leftover from that car almost BM> not stopping in time on the way to your appointment, etc., could cause BM> a transient fluctuation. Mine seem to be more from looking for a parking spot in the garage, or having to watch the waitingroom TV... ;) NB>>> That seems to be the case here, as well... I've heard that some states NB>>> are having issues with new spikes, but maybe there's less care being NB>>> taken by people as things begin to reopen... BM>> As I understand it a combination of more testing (so more reporting) BM>> and people improperly gathering. Can gather, can group, just need to BM>> do so with a bit of healthy caution. ...I'm surprised no one has done BM>> a "stranger danger" takeoff yet! NB>> Apparently, there's not been much caution in the states that are NB>> spiking significantly... I can understand wanting to throw off the NB>> traces, but it's just a bit too early yet... As I understand it, too, NB>> in many cases, the states started opening too early and too fast... NB>> and/or hadn't shut down enough to begin with... People here have NB>> complained about how restrictive things were, and at the slow pace of NB>> reopening... but on the other hand, we still are continuing to NB>> decrease, despite more testings and practically being fully reopened, NB>> although still with masks and distancing and reduced occupancy.... :) BM> Pretty much a definite agreement to all. LIS, additional testing will BM> find more cases, which makes those number charts look frighting but BM> probably a good thing as discovering low-level instances which would BM> still be passing on the disease unknowingly. Agreed... BM> From my sitting at the Computer Desk vantage point it seems the slow- BM> but-sure openign (25%, then 50%...) makes more sense as easier to BM> control gatherings just because less numbers. Of course that does BM> assume compliance. Indeed. And states that do have the compliance are able to move forward.... ;) BM> The financial side of things --
. LISB4, fortunately BM> I/we are retired and so our incomes were unaffected. Those working, BM> relying on paychecks to come in...