Subj : Re: Computer Kits To : Arelor From : Jeff Date : Sat Jan 29 2022 13:17:22 On 29 Jan 2022, Arelor said the following... Ar> > Regulation and control... like banning people who refuse to follow the Ar> > Remember when I said to hold that thought about people being cut off fr Ar> > friends and family by being banned? Here we are. People don't just get Ar> > randomly banned. They get banned because the platforms are exercising t Ar> > regulation and control that you believe they should have. Ar> Some platforms are better at keeping order than others. True. That also depends on one's definition of "keeping order." Obviously, if order is to be kept, then someone must make the distinction, however arbitrary it may seem, as to what's acceptable behavior and what is not. If those decisions are simply not made, then that's chaos not order. And I can guarantee you that not everyone is going to be happy with all of the decisions made, least of all those adversely affected by them. Ar> The RPG.net forums directly ban certain opinions. There are tons of Ar> stories online talking about people getting randomly banned from there Ar> for petty or unexplained reasons. And you feel that handing moderation of the RPG.net forums over to the government would improve the situation? What do you expect the government to do about this? Ar> RPG.net used to be THE forum you visited for RPG related discussion. It Ar> is no small site. It is not an insignificant piece of the Internet. It Ar> is (well, actually "was", because it comitted suicide) the goto place Ar> for people interested in a certain hobby. If they "committed suicide," then it sounds like they faced consequences for their decisions. Ar> And, in the most RPGish tradition, thy exercise their control by rolling Ar> a die in order to decide whether somebody gets banned, apparently. Heck, Ar> they have a public thread in which they display bans as trophies. And this should be illegal or regulated somehow? Should there be laws against arbitrary forum moderation? Should the government take a more active role and be responsible for deciding who gets banned and who doesn't? What government's jurisdiction does RPG.net fall under, anyway? Ar> Of course they have the right to do as they please but that turns the Ar> service into a bad service. And the people who are not happy with the service leave. No one is obligated to participate in the RPG.net forums. I've never heard of them until now. Ar> And a whole lot of services are just like that. So yeah, I think the Ar> ideological or random banhammer is something that exists even in big Ar> platforms and is something to be concerned off. I originally thought you were just talking about Facebook, Twitter, etc., as "social media," but the inclusion of internet forums is quite an interesting development. I feel even more strongly that these should be free from government regulation, with a few exceptions involving indisputably illegal activity. Jeff. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32) * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (21:1/180) .