Subj : Re: 386 OS/2 Woes...
To   : Nightfox
From : Tracker1
Date : Fri May 12 2023 21:37:19

 Tr>> I'd say at the point of Windows 2000 (NT Based) it had definitely
 Tr>> passed OS/2. Of course that was about a decade after the breakup.

 Ni> I thought Windows 2000 was pretty good. Being a newer OS, though, I think
 Ni> Windows 2000 probably had higher system requirements than OS/2.

Probably, I don't even remember what I was running when it came out.  I think I was using a 5x86-133 with 64mb ram and a 256k cache module with an s3 virge... Not 100% sure on that.  The next computer I remember at all was an OC'd AMD Duron at 1.1ghz and a Voodoo 3 video card, and don't remember how much ram at the time.  I did have 2x IBM DeskStar drives that were very fast but died within 3 days of each other in about 4 months of use around late 2000.
  
   
--    
Michael J. Ryan    
+o roughneckbbs.com   
tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
 * Origin: Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com (21:3/149)

.