Subj : Re: Nodelist Development
To   : stizzed
From : Avon
Date : Sun May 31 2020 15:32:18

On 30 May 2020 at 09:20a, stizzed pondered and said...
 
 st>  Ga> IMHO the actual nodelist should remain compliant with Fido/FTN 
 st>  Ga> defined standards.
 st> 
 st> Completely agree!  I think that what we are discussing is using the
 st> nodelist (for our purposes) within the standards.  For the most part
 st> these standards have not changed in years.  We should be able to use it
 st> and still remain within the guidelines.  Otherwise, we will need to
 st> develop an entirely new system.  Doable but 'worth the time'?

What I'm pondering are things like

- is the nodelist the best thing to use for our purposes.
- clarity around what those purposes are
- pro/cons of nodelist vs something new that does not need to conform to
anything already in existence
- possibility of leveraging the nodelist as a starter for something new

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/04/20 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

.