Subj : Re: Husky Config
To   : Avon
From : deon
Date : Tue Jan 12 2021 19:55:49

  Re: Re: Husky Config
  By: Avon to Al on Tue Jan 12 2021 08:26 pm

 Av> Based on this I take it that rules that set noroute instructions for a given node should be stated above rules that set more catch-all/blanket routing statements?
 Av> route crash noroute 3:770/100
 Av> route crash 3:712/848 3:*
 Av> I think should work OK.. but if I reversed those lines... would HPT route all netmail intended to 3:770/100 via 3:712/848?

Right. First match wins.

....лоеп

.... I belong to no organized party - I am a democrat.
--- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
 * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)

.