Subj : Re: Husky Config
To   : Al
From : Avon
Date : Tue Jan 12 2021 20:26:20

Hi Al

In the route file that dictates netmail rules. I read the following in the
manual

[snip]

Route statements are parsed in descending order: Pseudo-code:

       1) actual = first statement
       2) if linkWWW = msg-destination using pattern matching
       2a) take this routing and return
       2b) else actual = next statement
       3) jump to 2)

[snip]

Based on this I take it that rules that set noroute instructions for a given
node should be stated above rules that set more catch-all/blanket routing
statements?

e.g.

route crash noroute 3:770/100
route crash 3:712/848 3:*

I think should work OK.. but if I reversed those lines... would HPT route all
netmail intended to 3:770/100 via 3:712/848?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

.