Subj : Re: Blam BBS List question
To   : stizzed
From : vorlon
Date : Mon Jun 01 2020 12:42:34

 vo> Yes, and the talk about adding extra junk to the nodelist that
 vo> is built for mailers is just going to put more junk into the
 vo> nodelist.
 
 st> Ooooh, it would be so nice if we could get rid of the junk in the
 st> nodelist.

For othetr net's that's not a big issue as only one person normally looks
after it. For fido, join the line. #0)

I know my sectioon of the list for fido is as clean as it can be, and I
poke sysop's if I see issues via 3rd party out of band comms.
 
 vo> User access information should be done via another mediam.
 
 st> If much of it were not already there I would agree.  Im 50/50
 st> between using whats there and starting over.  There are a few
 st> attempts at lists out there already, the ibbslist comes to mind. 
 st> We could hi-jack one of these existing lists or create our own.  In
 st> any case, much of the information already contained in the already
 st> implemented nodelists is already there. (that sentence made my head
 st> hurt)  ;)

The start of the list can be collected via a nodelist(s), but the ending
information shouldn't be in the nodelist..




\/orlon
VK3HEG


--- MagickaBBS v0.15alpha (Linux/armv6l)
 * Origin: \/orlon Empire: Sector 550 (21:1/195.1)

.