Subj : Re: Synchronet vs Mystic vs ?? To : Arelor From : Gamgee Date : Tue Apr 18 2023 13:32:00 -=> Arelor wrote to Gamgee <=- Ar> Re: Re: Synchronet vs Mystic vs ?? Ar> By: Gamgee to Tracker1 on Mon Apr 17 2023 08:07 pm > I've never really seen the point of docker. Seems like a lot of extra > work for..... what? Security? I'm on a home LAN and am not worried > about that. As for backups etc... not sure how it could really be > easier than an automated rsync (or similar) every night, to both a LAN > device, and an off-location device. But anyway.... . > Ar> I am not a docker advocate, but now we are at it: Ar> The advantage of docker is that a developer may create and test Ar> an application in a given environment (with a set of libraries, Ar> databases and support components) and thenserve it to a use Ar> without caring too much about which environment the user is Ar> running (since the user will run it as if it were a capsule). Ar> Docker images are also stateless, which means you can create and Ar> destroy them on demand if you are running somehting which is very Ar> heavy load. For example, if you are running a heavy game service, Ar> you may use an orchestator to launch instances of the game Ar> service on demand according to the number of players you are Ar> getting, and then use a load balancer to spread the load across Ar> the nodes. If you have a spike of users,you auto-deploy game Ar> nodes. If users become few, you auto-reduce the number of nodes. Ar> Docker does not help that much with backups in that scenario Ar> because docker instances are supposed to be stateless. You Ar> typically have a storage backend for managing persistent data. Excellent explanation, thank you; and that actually makes good sense..... if you're a developer. Perhaps I should have added that to my statement above about it not making sense (for a "normal" user). .... All the easy problems have been solved. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138) .