Subj : Synchronet issues
To   : Spectre
From : apam
Date : Thu Oct 27 2022 16:32:18

 > To fair its been dead and buried for some time, only to attain zombie
 > status
 > and return.  I'm happy referring to it as Synchromess as that's what
 > it achieves for me.  Take or leave it, I'd already left it....

Yeah, because every time you type about synchronet you write synchromess.
Because you're either inept, stupid or a liar.

Can we all call you that? as that is what you are achieving here? Take it
or leave it?

No. I can't call you inept, stupid or a liar, because that's against the
standards of this net. Yet calling Rob's project synchromess is ok,
because?

Why does this even bother me? I haven't spent nearly as much time on my
projects as Rob has, Synchronet is arguably the best, most complete
package available now days for anyone wanting to run a BBS, and it's
free. It would bother me if some idiot defamed my project because for
what ever reason they stuffed up their file system and decided to blame
it on something completly unrelated.

Most of us know in this instance you're lying (or deluded), but newbies
not so much. It's unfair and uncalled for.

Stop it.

Andrew


--- Talisman v0.45-dev (Windows/x64)
 * Origin: Smuggler's Cove - Private BBS (21:1/182)

.