Subj : Re: sending to a fido address in thunderbird
To   : Spectre
From : Digital Man
Date : Mon Oct 24 2022 11:53:27

  Re: Re: sending to a fido address in thunderbird
  By: Spectre to Digital Man on Mon Oct 24 2022 04:53 pm

 >  DM> Okay, but mentioning it here (rather than an actual Synchronet support
 >  DM> forum) isn't likely to resolve the problem, so you weren't really
 >  DM> serious about finding and fixing the issue in the first place. Just
 >  DM> something to complain about.
 >
 > I did make the point, a fix was off the table, and if I recall right, the
 > original was merely an observation of what I'd been poking about with and
 > what the results were.

"A fix", assuming there's an issue, is never off the table. It sounds like you were conversing with people that don't have a say in what is on or off the table, or there actually wasn't anything to be fixed in the first place. I can't tell which it is, because you've provided no details.

 > No real complaint as such.

What is "Synchromess" then?

 > I gave it a go, ran
 > enough repair to keep the system running, gave it a second go with the same
 > result, and thats it. I'm not interested in trying any further with my
 > limited resources.  Unfortunately one of the results was the "true
 > believers" denied the observations and wanted to go to war over it.  Not
 > just take it as an observation and move on.

What was this "observation" exactly? I'll look again through the history of your posts in this echo, but so far, I haven't seen it.
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #50:
JAM and Squish were considered before developing Synchronet Message Base format
Norco, CA WX: 70.6øF, 15.0% humidity, 4 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (21:1/183)

.