Subj : Re: 3.5 weeks to being la To : Spectre From : Arelor Date : Sat Jul 23 2022 08:56:04 Re: Re: 3.5 weeks to being la By: Spectre to Arelor on Sat Jul 23 2022 07:50 pm > Ar> In any case, the kits I see deployed in Spain don't pour battery energy > Ar> into the grid. The whole point of batteries is to keep the power > Ar> for yourself, not to dump it into the grid. Dumping battery power > Ar> into the grid is moronic. > > Maybe, maybe not... there was talk about increasing feed in tarrifs when the > renewables are renewing... night time, still days... so you'd get more for > supply during expected peak, and low power generation crossover points. So i > you have spare capacity it would make sense. Renewables at this point reall > are a crock of shot...there is no way you could replace fossil power with > 100% renewable, you still need some kind of baseline power. > Renewables are not renewable :-) With the current stete of technology, there is no way they can take over traditional generation. Still,that is not the point. Neither is being more ecofriendly, because solar is polluting as heck and airgenerators consume resources that are no renewable. The point is anybody wealthy enough to set his how power generation will be able to make a dent in his power bill and recoup the investment in human time. Bonus points because if there is a disruption in the Energy supply chain (ie. WWIII) you will have a limited supply to cling to during the crisis. Certainly, most solñar I see deployed today are cheap investments intended to reduce the power bill rather than serious deployments intended to make a house slef-sufficent or close to self-sufficient. Of course, we are talking about domestic power generation, but here is this: * Estimated budget to make my house energy self-sufficient on solar only: 30k EUR * Estimated budget to make my house self-sufficient 92% of the year: 18k EUR. * Typical deployment for similar homes in my area: 6k EUR. (which makes you self-sufficient less than 25% of the year). The Government'splan for the transition of energy productivity is to have people install the latter: that way, solar systems will produce energy around 6 hours per day, with all excess power sold to the power grid. Then, owners of solar systems will purchase power from the grid during non-productive hours at a discount. The idea is that you compensate the energy you are forced to buy with the energy you poured in the grid when you were having excess - that way they tell you you don'tneed to invest in batteries, which are the single most expensive element). Sadly, that setup is quite lame because it ends up meaning that the owner invests 6k EUR, has power during 6 hours per day, and then gets to buy the defficitary energy by night at a 30% discount (and only a small fraction of the energy purchased comes with a discount, actually). IN other words: it is a scam. Power companies don't want you to have batteries because they want you to sell them cheap energy instead and then sell you expensive energy. I think a lot of the FUD against batteries comes from this. -- gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken --- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138) .