Subj : Re: News Sources To : Warpslide From : ACMEBBS Date : Sat May 14 2022 23:59:00 -=> Warpslide wrote to ACMEBBS <=- Wa> *** Quoting ACMEBBS from a message to boraxman *** AC> You are totally right. With much of the US media owned by a handfull AC> of companies...I don't trust anything I hear. That's why I only watch AC> non-US sources (Reuters/CBC/BBC/DW/NGK/60 Minutes Australia) to get Wa> ^^^ AC> an idea of what's going on Wa> I used to try and keep myself up-to-date as much as I could, but lately Wa> I'll just check in with the news as needed, otherwise it's just too Wa> depressing to read on a regular basis. Totally agree! Wa> The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is a federal Crown Wa> corporation (owned/funded by the government) but has traditionally been Wa> more left leaning regardless of who is in power. That's why I also like Reuters. Plus...never having visited outside the US...want to "broaden my horizons" to see what's going on outside the US with the rest of the world. Wa> One of the things I liked to do was read the same reporting from a Wa> "left" leaning news source and the same story from a "right" leaning Wa> news source. Only problem is with many of the news sources owned by around a handful of companies...these companies are going to do everything to keep their "gravy train" on the same track they always have been. Wa> It was always interesting to read how all of the facts of the reported Wa> issue/event were kept intact (x happened) but the reasons behind/blame Wa> assigned tend to be very different based on organizations left/right Wa> leanings and who is currently in power. (political party y is doing all Wa> they can vs political party y isn't doing enough). Very true. Wa> theglobeandmail.com (left) and nationalpost.com (right) are good Wa> examples of these reports. Will take a look at both of them. Thanks for giving me examples. .... "42? 7 and a half million years and all you can come up with is 42?!" --- MultiMail/Win v0.52 * Origin: fsxNet FTN<>QWK Gateway (21:4/10) .