Subj : Re: Windows vs Linux To : tenser From : boraxman Date : Wed Apr 27 2022 22:43:17 te> bo> As have I. And I say this with all due respect, but your style of te> bo> debate is somewhat difficult to digest. One brings up general ideas te> bo> which impact a majority of people, and you debunk it with a corner ca te> bo> which may affect a few, if any. te> te> Perhaps you find my style difficult to digest, and perhaps te> it is. However, the issue I have with your argument is that te> you make general assertions that are poorly supported, mostly te> through anecdotal evidence and appeals to authority, that are te> logically inconsistent, and then use those to make inferences te> that do not follow. te> te> You also have a tendency to go from one topic to something te> tangentially related. Recall that the genesis of this te> discussion was your assertion that you don't want to see te> Linux become easier to use because you fear losing something te> in return. My response has always been that I don't see how te> there's anything specific to Linux in particular that cannot te> be replicated elsewhere (really, if Linux becomes what you te> fear, simply move to FreeBSD, etc). It is unclear to me what te> the Unix pipelines and the composibility of tools has to do te> with it, and that seems like a non sequitur. Any really, the te> Linux people have no desire to take away your ability to do te> the sorts of things you appear to want to do. It's not going te> to happen. And if it did, you could fork your own distro: te> that's how it works. te> If I recall correctly, this started from a comment that Linux was more configurable, and more amenable to constructing your own workflows and system than Windows. That the Unix philosophy was based on composition of existing tools, whereas Windows evolved in a paradigm where computing solutions came from application solutions. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64) * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101) .