Subj : Re: Notice that...
To   : Mewcenary
From : Arelor
Date : Sun Feb 20 2022 06:29:07

  Re: Re: Notice that...
  By: Mewcenary to Arelor on Sun Feb 20 2022 07:39 am

 > It's not really about this when HR (or whoever) chcck online presence.
 > 
 > It's more a verification that the person is not completely toxic.  So that w
 > be information that the candidate is _choosing_ to put out there (typically 
 > Twitter).
 > 

I know a lot of people with burn-it-all-and-expropiate-stuff-in-the-name-of-wor
kers ideas who you'd would not like to have at your company, but your cursory
social media search would not reveal it outright because they use social media
for posting cheap motivational quotes.

Fun fact is one was denied entry to the US due to affiliation with terrorist
groups (lol) but afaik her social media was shinning clean.

What I mean is that if you want to pretend that your company has something such
as "company values" (hint: the only value a company with stock-holders has is
paying stock-holders), a cursory social media scan is such a weak barrier to
weed out the torch wielding street-fighters that refusing a candidate because
he won't pass this _secret_ test is plain moronic.




--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)

.