Subj : Re: Vibes To : boraxman From : tenser Date : Wed Jan 26 2022 03:32:25 On 25 Jan 2022 at 11:00p, boraxman pondered and said... bo> The disadvantages are obvious and perhaps outweight the advantages, but bo> for me, the advantages are This is an interesting perspective; thank you for sharing. I have a slight quibble I hope you'll consider. bo> 1) Easy to deploy on low end hardware. My experience is with Mystic, bo> which was easy to set up. Synchronet was harder, but Matrix isn't easy bo> either. True, though I would perhaps separate the ability to run well on low-end hardware from how easy something is to set up and configure. Mystic may well run on something as anemic as a Raspberry Pi 1, but you've already got Linux on that machine and it has essentially all of the same properties you listed. Similarly, a Matrix server may run on low-end hardware acceptably well, even if it is admittedly harder to configure. Something like Discourse seems is really very nice, but requires rather a lot of work and may require a beefier host system. bo> 2) Clients are simple, in the sense that they don't need to be updated to bo> accommodate server side changes. The user is using a thin client. The bo> communication protocol is straightforward telnet or SSH. Low barrier to bo> creating alternative clients. Funny, I actually see this as being a rather high barrier. Web browsers are ubiquitous; SSH clients less so, and telnet is fading into ever-greater obscurity. bo> 4) No third party at all. It is a direct connection from the remote bo> machine to yours. It is totally in your control. This isn't unique, bo> but an advantage. No one needs to even know it exists. This I somewhat disagree with: you have your ISP connection, rely on third-party DNS servers, etc. This was true in the dialup days as well, except then the third party was the telephone utility. Again, thanks for the interesting perspective. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/11/06 (Linux/64) * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101) .