Subj : Re: zone 4 ping
To   : Fernando Toledo
From : Ward Dossche
Date : Wed Mar 20 2024 00:10:39

Fernando,
 
FT> Unfortunately in the Z4 they are all inert. Nobody has an interest in
FT> improving something, or at least keeping the current thing working well.
FT> The ZC hasn't changed anything for 10 years and no one changes to the ZC
FT> =(
 
If you are of the opinion that change is overdue, then now is as good a time as ever to initiate change.
 
If you are dissatisfied and of the belief that another ZC could do a better job, then get the ball rolling. But there is a challenge: an impeachment procedure of a zone-coordinator has never been attempted that I know of. Plus in Z4 there are 4 listed RCs of which 2 are absent. Of the remaining 2 which are technically functional one is the ZC himself so unless he votes against himself provided he wakes up, then I fear the chances of achieving it are close to nothing.
 
Another possibility is to create one or several IP-only orphan nets and have these accomodated in a region in another zone. Talk to the International Coordinator about this and see how he feels about that.
 
FT> I try all the time to test software, to see what can be improved. IPv6,
FT> helping others try Fido and promoting it. But I'm completely alone in
FT> that.
 
Don't say that. There are several people willing to help out...
 
 \%/@rd

--- DB4 - 20230201
 * Origin: Many Glacier - Preserve / Protect / Conserve (2:292/854)

.