Subj : HVYRAIN: Excessive Rainfall Discussion To : wx-storm@lists.illinois.edu From : COD Weather Processor Date : Tue Feb 13 2024 07:30:42 FOUS30 KWBC 130730 QPFERD Excessive Rainfall Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 229 AM EST Tue Feb 13 2024 Day 1 Valid 12Z Tue Feb 13 2024 - 12Z Wed Feb 14 2024 The probability of rainfall exceeding flash flood guidance is less than 5 percent.=20=20 =20 Roth Day 2 Valid 12Z Wed Feb 14 2024 - 12Z Thu Feb 15 2024 ....A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL EXISTS FOR PORTIONS OF SOUTHWEST OREGON & NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA... Portions of coastal OR and northwest CA...=20 As a cyclone in the Pacific swings north a bit astride of the Pacific Northwest coastline, low-level inflow of up to 50 kts out of the south to southwest and precipitable water values of 0.75-1" impact portions of southwest OR as well as west-central and northwest CA. With time, small bubbles of 250 J/kg of MU CAPE (per 00z NAM forecasts) are expected to move near the region.=20 QPF-wise, since this time yesterday, the non-NAM and non-Canadian Regional guidance has trended upward in amounts. Given the above, hourly rain totals of 0.5"+ are more probable, and the 00z HREF now shows a 40%+ chance of occurring by 15/00z, which would be of most concern in burn scars. This led to a new Marginal Risk area for the region. Roth Day 3 Valid 12Z Thu Feb 15 2024 - 12Z Fri Feb 16 2024 The probability of rainfall exceeding flash flood guidance is less than 5 percent. Portions of OR & CA... Precipitable water values are on the decline this period as the flow across the region switches from onshore to offshore. The precipitation forecast from the model guidance, outside the 00z Canadian Regional in western WA and OR, was nothing to write home about. Given the above, the Marginal Risk was removed in this update. Lower Rio Grande Valley of Southern TX... Moist inflow surges into the region from the western Gulf of Mexico as a warm front moves into the region late Thursday night into early Friday morning. Precipitable water values rise into the 1.75-2" range. Temperatures at 700 hPa don't seem especially warm, generally below 3C, which implies minimal, if any, mid-level capping. However, instability appears meager, with bubbles of 250+ J/kg of MU CAPE per NAM forecasts, and appears to be outrunning the boundary/QPF into northern TX which won't aid precipitation production. Guidance QPF is modest, with the 00z GFS and the 00z NAM the most bullish, though their amounts are under 3". For the most part, precipitation anomalies as far back as 90 days are below average in this area. Given the above, believe the risk for flash flooding is less than 5 percent.=20 Should the guidance become wetter or the timing speed up somewhat, a Marginal Risk could be considered on later forecast cycles. Roth Day 1 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/94epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!9U56qmIg9B-m716fIXXd_8Hgla4mx6NPHc1QAgEQuk4a= ul5YRXop5csMTuTijFO5D8KwBmcWXxq7vP2nuMY3W0N-Rlg$=20 Day 2 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/98epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!9U56qmIg9B-m716fIXXd_8Hgla4mx6NPHc1QAgEQuk4a= ul5YRXop5csMTuTijFO5D8KwBmcWXxq7vP2nuMY3aClSeBw$=20 Day 3 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/99epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!9U56qmIg9B-m716fIXXd_8Hgla4mx6NPHc1QAgEQuk4a= ul5YRXop5csMTuTijFO5D8KwBmcWXxq7vP2nuMY3D0Bnn04$=20 $$ =3D =3D =3D To unsubscribe from WX-STORM and you already have a login, go to https://lists.illinois.edu and use the "Unsubscribe" link. Otherwise email Chris Novy at cnovy@cox.net and ask to be removed from WX-STORM. --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) .