Subj : Re: Kirk and Spock in the news, again (link)
To   : All
From : Your Name
Date : Sat Jun 14 2014 10:05:17

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: YourName@YourISP.com
Subject: Re: Kirk and Spock in the news, again (link)

In article <539af9f9$0$2964$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Wouter
Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> Your Name schreef op 13-6-2014 08:12:
> > In article <lne2q7$nln$1@dont-email.me>, ToolPackinMama
> > <philnblanc@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.cnet.com/news/americans-think-star-trek-is-the-future-not-star-w
> >> ars-study-says/
> >
> > Well, DUH!
> > Star Wars is set "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away".
> > Star Trek is set in Earth's near-ish future.
> >
> 
> ROFL
> 
> I'd take Star Trek over Star Wars any day.
> 
> Not that I'm totally anti Star Wars. I liked Star Wars (IV) and TESB 
> very much. ROTJ was a lesser movie and the prequels... Never mind them.

The only real issue with Star Wars is that there was such a long time
between the trilogies, meaning they look quite different due to
technology improvements, differeing style, over-the-top fight scenes,
etc. Many of the later additions to the Original Trilogy look out of
place with the older film quality / style. If all six (and soon a
ridiculously tacked-on third Trilogy) had been made continuously like
"Harry Potter", for example, then those differences would have been
much less noticeable.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
 * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (1:2320/105.97)
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
 * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)

.