Subj : Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to
To   : All
From : Duggy
Date : Fri Nov 18 2011 17:34:02

From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au
Subject: Re: Star Trek (2009) Someone explain this to me?

On Nov 18, 10:03apm, Akira Norimaki <diotona...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I liked "Blindness", "Code 46", "Cube", "Cypher"...
> I've never seen "Blindness"
Blindess is a film about people suddenly going blind and the first
people getting surviving in quarantine.
It's not action SF by any means... an interesting drama, though.
> and "Cypher", so wish-listed.
Spy thriller with some action and cheap FX by the guy who did Cube.
> I had a really
> hard time watching "Code 46", they whisper a lot and that's a pain with
> a language is not your own, thus I may be biased, I didn't like it.
Fair enough.
> I did like "Cube".
I didn't like Cube 2.
I linked the first half hour or so of "The Island"... then it went to
shit.
> >> but I disagree on First Contact. Unless you are saying
> >> that FC was a ST:TOS movie, in that case I sort of agree. The
> >> kirkization of Picard in FC was complete(d).
> > OK, yeah, Picard as action hero wasn't very TNG... but big borg
> > episode was... they even had to reset the Borg to do it.
> True. Although those Borgs were more Voyager's that TNG's.
Good point.
Still don't think the "Think 4 dimensionally line makes sense."
===
= DUG.
===
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
 # Origin: http://groups.google.com (1:2320/105.97)
 * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)

.