Subj : Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing To : John Aldridge From : Ahem A Rivet's Shot Date : Thu Aug 29 2024 19:13:34 On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:57:57 +0100 John Aldridge wrote: > In article <20240829102839.5bb67af25e568ebabc65ede6@eircom.net>, > steveo@eircom.net says... > > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:32:49 +0100 > > Richard Kettlewell wrote: > > > > > I don?t think I?d fault either decision though the fact that we?ve > > > ended up with two conventions does make writing/maintaining portable > > > code a bit more annoying, > > > > Portable code should only rely on the standards not > > implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the > > standard. > > Heh, yes. I worked for several years on a machine where a null pointer > wasn't all bits zero, and where char* was a different size to any other > pointer. That rings vague bells, what was it ? -- Steve O'Hara-Smith Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/ For forms of government let fools contest Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3) .