Subj : Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing
To   : All
From : John Aldridge
Date : Thu Aug 29 2024 18:57:57

In article <20240829102839.5bb67af25e568ebabc65ede6@eircom.net>,
steveo@eircom.net says...
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:32:49 +0100
> Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I don?t think I?d fault either decision though the fact that we?ve ended
> > up with two conventions does make writing/maintaining portable code a
> > bit more annoying,
>
> 	Portable code should only rely on the standards not
> implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the
> standard.

Heh, yes. I worked for several years on a machine where a null pointer
wasn't all bits zero, and where char* was a different size to any other
pointer.

--
John

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

.