Subj : Re: RP2350 and Pico 2 - things missing
To   : Richard Kettlewell
From : Ahem A Rivet's Shot
Date : Thu Aug 29 2024 10:28:39

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:32:49 +0100
Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> I don’t think I’d fault either decision though the fact that we’ve ended
> up with two conventions does make writing/maintaining portable code a
> bit more annoying,

	Portable code should only rely on the standards not
implementations, some very weird possibilities are legal within the
standard.

	There are always the int<n>_t types for when size matters.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
For forms of government let fools contest
Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

.