Subj : Democratic Failure
To   : ALAN IANSON
From : Mike Powell
Date : Wed Jan 01 2025 09:22:00

>  >  > There is no comparison between these two incidents.

>  >  MP> There is enough of a comparison that they will be hard-pressed to get
>  >  MP> a conviction after letting Biden off.

>  > A conviction? There was never going to be a conviction or even a trial.
>  > There was no crime.

>  MP> A conviction of Trump.  They don't teach you much about context up in
>  MP> BC, do they?

> You have lost your own narrative. Your comments and my reply were about Biden,
> but we can talk about trump.

No, dumbass, you lost it.  You were comparing Biden's crime to Trump's.

Re-read the above.  Unless you were talking about two different *Biden*
incidents, the context is obvious (despite the parts you've removed).

> Biden did improperly store those documents, that is the end of that story.

That is a crime.

>  MP> And there was indeed a crime, in *both* cases.  If Biden or Trump were
>  MP> just about anyone else besides a politician, keeping classified
>  MP> documents in the manner that they did would have landed them in jail
>  MP> and/or heavily fined.

> Trump took documents from the white house. Stored them in the bathroom at
> Mar-a-Logo among other places there about.

Biden took documents home, as a VP/Senator, and stored them in his garage.
*Both* are crimes.

>  MP> Having worked with classified data most of my life, I know this.  In my
>  MP> state, you are not only covered by federal laws that promise jail time
>  MP> and fines, but there are also state level laws for mishandling
>  MP> classified federal documents and data that also carry jail time and
>  MP> fines.

> I didn't realize you were an FBI agent.

I am not, but I worked with classified federal and state data for over 20
years.  Anyone who handles this data is covered by laws regarding how they
handle it... the FBI, the IRS, politicians, state agency employees, etc.

>  > There is no crime or evidence of any crime.

>  MP> As we are talking about *Trump*, I am shocked to hear you say that but,
>  MP> then again, not too surprised as you are pretty dense.

> Again, your comments and my reply was about Biden. Dense indeed.

No, in that part of the conversation, we were discussing Trump.  You have
cut that part of the conversation out, just like you always do when you are
playing stupid.

>  MP> Yes, it is.  The last time anyone was issues such a blanket pardon, it
>  MP> was Richard Nixon.

> Are you comparing the Hunter pardon to the Nixon pardon? Please stop.

I did not.  Someone who handled Presidential pardons for several years --
someone who knows more about it than me and *especially* you -- said that.
There were not intentionally igorant enough to ignore that it was indeed a
*blanket* pardon.

In that context, they are comparable.


 * SLMR 2.1a * Limit Congress to 2 terms: one in office, one in jail!
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

.