Subj : Re: Documents Case Tossed
To   : ALAN IANSON
From : Mike Powell
Date : Tue Jul 23 2024 10:46:00

> > So you believe the special prosecutor is not a member of the prosecution?

> I never said that, you did.

No, you did.

> > There is your problem right there.

> This is my last attempt..

> The issue is not about any prosecution or who the prosecutor is.

> The issue (for Aileen) is that a special prosecution is unconstitutional and
> that Jack Smith was wrongly appointed.

NO, it isn't.  The issue, per the ruling, is that the special prosecution
was improperly appointed and said appointment is therefore unconsitutional.

"A special prosecution is unconstitutional" -- your words above -- was NOT
part of the ruling.  The way the special prosecution was appointed --
unconstitutionally -- *IS THE ISSUE*.

So, YES, there is an issue about the prosecution (ruled to be using a
special prosecutor that was improperly appointed) and who the prosecutor is
(ruled to be someone who was not constitutionally appointed).


 * SLMR 2.1a * The girl of your dreams is unavailable except in print
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

.