Subj : Re: Interesting things
To   : IB Joe
From : Ron L.
Date : Tue Jan 30 2024 07:13:28

-=> IB Joe wrote to All <=-

 IJ> He refereed to Vivek and Nikki as anchor babies... I would not of
 IJ> called them that.

Well, technically, they are.  The whole concept of the "anthor baby" was for
foreign parents (here legally or not) to give birth to a baby that is legally a
U.S. citizen.  We can't deport the baby, nor can we deport the parents then.

The parents become naturalized.  Then they bring over potential sibilings,
cousins, aunts/uncles, etc.

 IJ> Here's what he said that made me think... The Democrats will argue that
 IJ> these people do not meet the criteria of "Naturally Born" and as a
 IJ> result they  can't be on the ticket and as a result should be taken off
 IJ> the ballot.

Of course, that begs the question of what is "unnaturally born"? Which would
describe all Leftists.  :)

 IJ> There won't be time to clear the issue up before the election... If the
 IJ> current state of affairs are anything like what the Democrats are
 IJ> capable of doing he made a reasonable argument...

But the Elitists are playing the long game here.  The current crop of illegals
are just warm bodies.  They can't be counted for congressional districts since
they are non-voters.  Some Elitist run areas may allow them to vote in the
local elections, but that really won't change much.

It's their kids that will be the problem.  Remember the "Dreamer" controversy?
Children of illegals born in the U.S. and are now adults.  Under the law, they
are illegals, but they have never known their parent's country.  How do you
deport someone to a country they have never been to?


.... Today is cancelled due to lack of interest!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
 * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

.