Subj : Re: Aclj
To   : IB JOE
From : MIKE POWELL
Date : Mon Jan 08 2024 09:31:00

|  MP> You do realize that your first sentence there, re: states handle the
|  MP> legality of things, contradicts one of your earlier arguments, right?
|  MP>
|
| I'm a Canadian who naturalized to the US... As a result I had to pass a civics
| test... you might want to review some things...
|
| Here U go... for review.... There are crimes that are handled at the State
| level and some at the Federal level... Here are some names of CRIMES that the
| Feds handle... Murder, Bank Robbery and Insurrection just to name a few....
 
States handle murder, too.  And you did not answer my question re: you do
realize that you are contradicting yourself (and again, I might add)?
 
| So, how did the Feds solve this problem... They made some crimes Federal
| crimes... Like Murder, Robbing banks and Insurrection.  In cases like this...
| The FBI, US Marshals and a local US District Attorney investigate and gather
| evidence ... that evidence
 
Murder is not only a federal crime.
 
| So lets bring this back... And I have said this before... A Grand Jury needs to
| hear evidence... Consider this evidence and recommend charges to a local US
| DA... That evidence will be presented to a Federal Judge and/or jury those
| people will determine gu
|
| So again... It's not up to the Colorado Supreme Court to come to some kind of
| decision on guilt denying someone of their due process rights.  It's not up to
| has ever made in the
 
Here is where you get lost.  State Legislatures, who set STATE laws, MUST,
MUST, MUST consider the US CONSTITUTION before setting a law.  State Courts
MUST, MUST, MUST consider the US CONSTITUTION when interpreting their STATE
LAWS.  You have said they previously that they *do not/should not* consider
the US Constitution which is false.
 
State Legislatures can indeed set a STATE law that says that persons who
are not US CONSTITUTIONALLY eligible to hold office must not be included on
their STATE ballots.  The US CONSTITUTION gives them the authority to do so.
 
These laws HAVE BEEN put into use before.  GORSUCH ruled on such a law in
COLORADO.  The State SoS has not only the right, but a DUTY to follow such a
law.  They swear an oath to do so.
 
The issue is whether or not they (the Colorado SC and now the Maine SoS)
interpreted the law correctly in this case. The SCOTUS can and will likely
decide this in the Colorado case.
 
Regarding the 14th Amendment, it was indeed put into blanket use against
several thousand persons in the South who were never tried for any crimes. It
has only really been attempted twice since, over 100 years ago during the
WWI era.  One attempt was not successful, and the other was apparently never
questioned in court.
 
| If you need help to better understand the Constitution and the legal processes
| I'll send you some YouTube links.
+-[IJ=>MP]
 
I suggest strongly you QUIT watching Youtube and restudy your Civics
books.  And maybe some reading comprehension classes.
 
Watching Youtube all day doesn't make you a legal expert.  It makes you the
conservative equivalent to a lefty who watches M$NBC all day.
 
##Mmr 2.61(beta).  !link IJ  1-05-24  9:45 
---
 * BgNet 1.0b12 = moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

.