Subj : Re: Joe's policies To : DALE SHIPP From : Mike Powell Date : Mon Jul 31 2023 09:09:00 > MP> IIRC, you all are talking economy. Once this administration is done > MP> (and some of their plans will stretch well into other administrations), > MP> that Energy policy will put most of us in a position where we won't be > MP> able to travel or use many/any household appliances because, if we do, > MP> we won't be able to afford anything else. > That sounds like speculation. Have you actually seen independent > studies that make that claim? I would call it educated speculation. The appliances that meet their new standards will cost more as the low-end offerings, that those of low and fixed income can afford, will no longer be legal. EVs do and will continue to cost more as they require expensive batteries (with rare earth elements mined by near-slave and child labor). It does not take an economics or finance major to figure this stuff out. > MP> Meahwhile, some of that policy, while making us feel good about > MP> supposedly being "green," will continue to ruin the environment in > MP> other parts of the World, and at a more accelerated pace. > Nor do I see how that statement can be logical. How is what we are > doing going to ruin the environment elsewhere? A while back I posted an article about this. Obtaining the rare earth elements that are used in EV batteries (and also in cell phones) is not a clean industry. I will repost the article with this thread subject. It was more about the child labor, IIRC, but it also includes info on the environmental impacts. Specifically: The electronic vehicle discussion is "meant to be a green choice in pursuit of climate sustainability goals. Yet it's utterly destructive to the environment of the Congo. Our green energy transition -- migrating from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles -- is built, in large part, from the battery pack standpoint, on the utter destruction of the environment of the Congo. Millions of trees have been clear-cut. Foreign mining companies dump all the toxic effluence from their processing facilities into the water, into the air, the dirt. Everything is polluted." > I can see that since some other countries don't do what they should, > then their environment and ours will suffer. If the did what they should, the cost of labor and the end product would skyrocket. I do believe they should be doing what they should, and our government should not be trying to mandate us into poverty. Such mandates are what lead to the use of child labor and poor environmental practices elsewhere. * SLMR 2.1a * Never check for an error you don't know how to handle. --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105) .