Subj : Re: IRS Testimony To : Gregory Deyss From : Alan Ianson Date : Sun Jul 30 2023 04:13:56 >> The charges were brought for the US DOJ. Hardly a kangaroo court. > You need to understand the motive behind these men of the DOJ; who they are > to have a full understanding of why and what they are doing. I understand The motive behind the charges. > I get it, you could care less, but when they fall, and make no mistake they > will fall. You then might then be interested why they fell and more > importantly how they could of let you down. I do care. I believe Donald Trump will fall. Because of his own actions, not someone elses. >> That doesn't aanswer why you (or someone else) keeps bringing up Hunter >> Biden. > Hunter is a slime ball and all roads do lead to the Big Guy (Joe Biden) or > maybe you didn't hear that hunter's sweetheart deal fell apart. Oh right. I forgot. The "Big Guy". >> They are completely legitimate. Questions? Ask a lawyer. > Any such lawyer that operates to protect Hunter Biden, and who goes along > corrupt DOJ should be disbarred. It is these same lawyers who want to ban and > disbar any lawyer if they get hired by Trump. This is the stuff that goes on > within a banana republic, not the United States of America. I am saying the charges against Trump are legitimate and if you question that then ask a lawyer, not spin up some nonsense to back up an unsupportable position. >> The mind of Trump voters is not a concern. > Maybe not to you a Canadian, but none the less I do believe there is an > effort to change the minds of voters, as they try to paint a negative view > of Trump. We already know what Trump brought as a previous President and it > was marvelous and from those years most of us can see what a complete train > wreck the Biden Administration has been and we can also see where it is > going in a downward spiral. I know you and many others voted for Donald Trump and you wanted him to continue. The fact that didn't happen doesn't mean there is some kind of downward spiral. >> 2. Ever notice when the heat is turned up on Biden, mysteriously it follo >> > another charge within a few days thereafter against Trump. >> > This is a distraction. It is entirely dishonest as well. It is completely honest and not a distraction. I knew these investigations were underway (as did Donald Trump) and charges would be laid when/if evidence to support charges was found. >> I am surprised by the charges too. I never expected any of the >> "documents" charges. It never crossed my mind. Trump could have avoided >> those simply by returning the documents when he was asked to return them. >The Presidential Records Acts says he has 5 years to work with this office, it >has only been 3 and he was working with this office, then his place gets raide > by Garland's DOJ. Trouble is the Presidential Records act was never mentioned >as the act that was allegedly violated. The only thing that they could come up > with is the a so called violation of the Espionage Act. > The Act also outlawed false statements intended to interfere with military > operations; attempts to incite insubordination or obstruct the recruitment of >troops; and false statements promoting the success of America's enemies. Those > charged with violations were subject to a $10,000 fine and twenty years > imprisonment. > Explain to me or attempt to explain how this fits against Trump. Many have been charged under the espionage act, not all were "spies". Recently. The charges are not about the presidential records act although Trump would lose such a case also. The charges are all around national security. Do you care about America and national security? >> I don't care much about the Stormy charges either. He could have avoided >> those charges too. > Bragg is a complete imbecile his case is pointless, he has yet to explain how >the misdemeanor gets boot strapped into a a felony, or what crime was committe > to create the felony. >Nonetheless the statue of limitations has expired over a year ago from when we > all learned of Alvin Cheeseburger Bragg. I haven't followed the Stormy case, no idea. >> I have been expecting charges around Jan. 6 and the fake electors and the >> Georgia phone call. Those (all in fact) charges are well deserved and I >> hope he will be convicted for those actions. >The Defense will have the transcript of what was said, by all parties includin > Trump. There was nothing wrong with that Georgia phone call. That was not the "perfect phone call" as you call it. "Guys, gimme a break. I need 11,000 votes" The Georgia indictment is going to be a tough one for Donald Trump. >> The "documents" case, the Georgia cases, and the Jan. 6 has been going >> on since shortly after the donald left office. He was not a candidate at >> the time. He was private citizen so it is clearly not political. > If Donald Trump wasn't running for election of the Presidency there wouldn't > be any charges, they are doing all of this to stop him (or so they think) of > Trump becoming the next President) haven't you been paying attention? Uh, yeah, there would be. As I said these investigations were well under way before Donald Trump announced he was running. > There is no case for January 6th either, again there is the matter of the > transcript of every word spoken by Trump and I do believe he told people to >(paraphrasing) "to remain peaceful", he even inquired about having the nationa > guard at this event, a day or days before the event but the newscast that you > watch or the newspapers you read didn't cover this at all, did it? Donald Trump did say early on Jan 6 to "peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol". Near the end of his speach he also said "If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". What were all the fake elector about? They were about installing a president not elected by the people. The Jan. 6 case is also strong. I am not sure how Donald's defence lawyers will defend that although they will have to come up with a defence. --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6 * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757) .