Subj : Re: FBI To : Gregory Deyss From : Dale Shipp Date : Mon Jun 12 2023 02:30:02 -=> On 06-11-23 11:25, Gregory Deyss <=- -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: FBI <=- DS> I stated the facts, not liberal nor conservative. You are the one DS> trying to create an argument against a narrative DS> that was never stated GD> I am not buying your innocent elixir, or that I am trying GD> to create any such argument. GD> The entirety of lets get Trump on charges is wrong. DS> It is not "lets [sic] get Trump on charges", it is "let's charge and DS> convict those who violate the law". GD> Shouldn't the law apply to everyone equally? Yes. GD> Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails from her private GD> server that was in a broom closet (that she was not GD> authorized to have in the first place.) GD> She smashed up blackberries with a hammer, wiped servers clean GD> (and no not with a cloth or something.) GD> Using Bleach-bit which is a very expensive process. GD> Remember what is was that James Comey said? GD> "No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case." Were those emails classified? Yes, she had a private server for emails. That was not unusual for the previous Secretaries. I seem to recall that none of the emails were marked as being classified -- compare that to the documents that Trump had and hid. The quote from Comey implies that there was not enough evidence of malfeasance to prosecute. GD> Sleepy Uncle Joe Biden GD> Biden had 1850 boxes of classified documents that were GD> sprawled across numerous states. And when that was discovered, he invited the DOJ to come search and remove any documents that should not be there. He did not hide any documents from DOJ. GD> Chinatown Washington, D.C. GD> https://tinyurl.com/2whka6b5 GD> There seems to be a convincing and quite an alarming GD> Chinese Communist Party connection. I watched that video from Fox News. It was a lot of speculation and no proof of anything. <> Hunter Biden is a separate person from the President, and all of that yelling gave no evidence of any illegal connections. GD> More on this this "Made Man" Antony (wink-wink) Blinken. GD> URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdd2hzka More speculation and accusation without presenting any proof of anything. GD> want more proof: https://tinyurl.com/2p9c6p8v I did not see proof of wrong doing. I saw information that may or may not lead to proof of something illegal or improper. Most of it seems to relate to Hunter Biden. Whether or not there is implication of President Biden is not stated, at least not clearly. GD> Consideration of the above it is now coming into crystal GD> clear focus as to why Merrit-LESS Garland is going after GD> Trump. None of that has anything to do with the investigation and charges against Donald Trump -- which were not done by Merritt Garland. GD> Garland and many Democrats, in their quest to hold Donald Trump GD> accountable under federal statutes relating to record retention and GD> classified information, are operating under the premise GD> that Trump can be treated like any other government GD> employee someone who can be caught up in a legalistic GD> debate about the possession of documents that are arguably GD> classified, and their responsibilities associated with GD> such. GD> But that's just not the case. That is exactly the case. Donald Trump is not above the law. He is a private citizen and is subject to the same laws as you or I. GD> Even if Trump did have documents that were once classified GD> containing information critical to the nation's security, GD> documents that he did not readily return to the National GD> Archives or the DOJ, he may well have violated no criminal GD> statute. Not "may well have violated no criminal statute", but "did violate criminal statutes". Plus, the documents were not "once classified", they are classified. GD> The President of the United States has unlimited access to all GD> classified information. Any other government employee who accesses GD> secret or top-secret information must possess the proper GD> security clearance to do so, which typically entails their GD> undergoing detailed background checks, polygraphs, and GD> continuing responsibilities to report any information that GD> could impact their trustworthiness such as arrests, foreign GD> contacts, and the like. GD> But U.S. presidents do not possess any security clearance at all. To GD> the contrary, the president is the [classification authority] GD> with the power to determine who can access classified GD> information, who can be granted security clearances (or GD> have theirs revoked), and even to determine what is GD> considered classified in the first place. The president GD> possesses this power because he is entrusted, among other GD> things, with both the command of our military forces and GD> the international relations that we have with other GD> countries, functions that GD> obviously require access to information of the highest sensitivity. What you say is true. But you seem to be glossing over the fact that Donald Trump is not the President. Dale Shipp fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net (1:261/1466) .... Shipwrecked in Silver Spring, Maryland. 01:44:55, 12 Jun 2023 ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 --- Maximus/NT 3.01 * Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466) .