Subj : Re: FBI
To   : GREGORY DEYSS
From : Mike Powell
Date : Thu Jun 08 2023 18:35:00

> "The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but
> did NOT find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired
>  coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple
f
> rts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."

Here is what I don't understand.  If you listen to HRC and her followers,
Biden and his, many other Democrats, and most leftist, it is Republicans
and "right-wingers" who are likely to believe crazy conspiracy theories
that the learn from internet sources.  Those same folks will also point out
that Democrats and their voters are allegedly smarter -- too smart to fall
for such nonsense.

Yet, in order to fully believe there was Russian interference, and that the
interference was actually affective, you have to believe just the opposite.
 You have to believe that somehow, despite being smarter and less easily
mislead by internet nonsense, the potential 2016 HRC voters were somehow
easily mislead by the Russian disinformation that they encountered on
social media and wherever else.

So, which is it?  Are the Democrats and their potential voters really that
much smarter and savvy that they don't fall for such things (meaning the
Russian disinformation campaign actually had little affect on anything), or
do most Democrats lie about how smart their potential voters are?

I honestly believe the latter.  They are just as likely to be caught in
disinformation they read on social media as anyone else... maybe more so,
since they traditionally are more likely to participate on multiple social
media platforms.


 * SLMR 2.1a * Usually a man with flowers has deflowering in mind...
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

.