Subj : Pre-2021 vs. 2023
To   : Dale Shipp
From : Lee Lofaso
Date : Thu Mar 23 2023 20:21:31

Hello Dale,

 DS>> His campaign communicated with Russia, but conclusion or colaboration
 DS>> has not been proven.

 BF>> Oh yes, it has. The only reason it didn't result in
 BF>> anything, was that Trump's hand-picked attorney general
 BF>> censored the report, and only passed on his own summery of
 BF>> it to the committee. Even today, the complete, un-redacted
 BF>> version is not available...

 DS> I would like you to publish information to support your statement that the
 DS> Trump campaign was proven to collaborate with Russia. That is contrary to
 DS> what I have read and heard.

According to the Mueller Report, Bj”rn is absolutely correct.

 DS> It is true that Barr published a summary report of his own which showed
 DS> that he had not even read the Mueller report OR that he was deliberately
 DS> lying.

Mueller's Report counted for everything, regardless of Barr's opinion.

 DS> I quote from the actual Mueller report, page 181:
 DS> [quote]

 DS> For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint
 DS> criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the
 DS> commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office considered in particular
 DS> whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
 DS> individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy-either
 DS> under statutes that have their own conspiracy language (e.g., 18 U.S.C.
 DS> §§ 1349, 195l(a)) , or under the general conspiracy statute (18 U.S .C.
 DS> § 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described
 DS> in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any
 DS> substantive violation of federal criminal law- including
 DS> foreign-fnfluence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed
 DS> further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual
 DS> associated with the Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal
 DS> offense arising from Russia contacts, either under a specific statute or
 DS> under Section 371 's offenses clause.

 DS> [/quote]

There is a difference between conspiracy and collaboration. As duly
noted by Mueller himself.

For Life,
Lee

-- 
If we don't get it / Shut it down!

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
 * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

.