Subj : Re: Why not Trump To : Dale Shipp From : Aaron Thomas Date : Wed Sep 28 2022 14:04:01 DS> DS> Then you do not understand what is involved. Some of the documents t DS> DS> he had contained very sensitive information and were just laying arou DS> DS> in a manner such that multiple people, including foreign spys, could DS> DS> easily get to them. Some of those documents could have gotten DS> DS> intelligence assets of the USA killed. They were assets who were DS> DS> risking their life to provide the USA with valuable information that DS> DS> helps to keep America safe. Other documents would have revealed sour DS> DS> and methods that would tell a foreign government where and how we wer DS> DS> obtaining valuable intelligence information about that foreign DS> DS> government. Once that foreign government knew that, they could close DS> DS> the door on our access and thus deny the USA from obtaining that DS> DS> information -- and thus harm the national security of the USA. DS> DS> AT> What about Hillary's private email server while she was Secretary of DS> AT> State? DS> DS> Is that all you have to say? Bringing up an old "whataboutit" that has DS> been discussed to death and dismissed because none of the emails were DS> marked classified. The appropriate comparison is like comparing a grape DS> to a durian. Your paragraph has a bunch of "what ifs" in it too. Nobody knows if classified information was contained in Hillary's private server because so many of the emails had already been deleted. "What if spies came to Trump's house and read the documents?" Nobody has addressed the issue of what's in those documents that Trump illegally obtained, but everyone has enthusiasm about "Trump did something that jeopardized our national security!" We're getting people pumped-up about how "dangerous" Trump is, which has been the name of the game since day 1. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64) * Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99) .