Subj : Re: fbi
To   : Gregory Deyss
From : Jeff Thiele
Date : Sat Sep 03 2022 10:16:04

On 03 Sep 2022, Gregory Deyss said the following...
 GD>  JT>  GD> You bleed freely for everything that this bonehead biden has eve
 GD>  JT>  GD> stuttered. Your also in denial, just as much as the Whitehouse o
 GD>  JT>  GD> pathetic Karine Jean-Pierre, who claims that illegals are not wa
 GD>  JT>  GD> into the U.S. when there is video evidence to state otherwise.
 GD>  JT> Refugees seeking asylum are walking into the U.S. Refugees seeking
 GD>  JT> asylum are not "illegals." And this has nothing to do with whether Fo
 GD>  JT> News' reporting on election night were deceptive or not. You are
 GD>  JT> frantically trying to change the subject.
 GD> A few points to made here. 
 GD> The deceptiveness that "WE" on the Right, are talking about had nothing
 GD> to do with the ever growing immigration problem. 

Ok. You brought it up. I said it was irrelevant. You agree that it was
irrelevant. I suppose that's progress.

 GD> It had to do with pundits - so called experts, that were giving their
 GD> analysis on the vote count on election night and some of those, sounded
 GD> a bit too much supporters of the Democratic party.

You seem to be confusing cause and effect again. The election-night punditry
did not affect the vote count; the vote count affected the election-night
punditry. 

 GD> What is the difference between refugees seeking asylum from corrupt
 GD> countries with no opportunity for their families - which is why "they"
 GD> are coming here to the U.S. but the "Land of the Free" does not mean
 GD> that everything is free, but democrats sure do try their best to make
 GD> that a reality. Why would that be Jeff? 

Usually when one starts a sentence with "What is the difference between," two
different things follow, usually separated by "and." I cannot figure out what
those two things are in this sentence.

The best I can figure out is that you're asking the difference between
refugees seeking asylum and Democrat support for the social safety net. I
don't even know where to start in answering that.

 GD> Are they hoping that these people become new democrats themselves? 

Maybe they're just hoping they'll live happy, productive lives.

 GD> No one does nothing for nobody unless there is something in it for them.

Wow, that's quite a statement. There are a lot of examples to counter it, but
I'll go with Jimmy Carter, who donates time and money to Habitat for Humanity
and expects nothing in return.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
 * Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

.