Subj : Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations To : Alan Beck From : Dan Clough Date : Fri Jun 02 2023 21:16:00 -=> Alan Beck wrote to Dan Clough <=- DC>> 1. What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing DC>> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader. I operate a BBS, DC>> and have used offline mail readers for years. Just wondering how/if a DC>> point would be "better" in some way. What can it do for me that I can't DC>> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)? AB>> Being a point is great, you just poll your bossnode and the mail comes AB>> in, easy peasy. DC> Yes, I understand that. But it's also easy to grab a QWK packet from DC> (my) BBS and read/reply that way. So... point has no advantage there. DC>> 2. I'm interested (only) in software for Linux. A glance through the DC>> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point DC>> software of choice. Pretty much true? Any alternatives to that? AB>> Explore WinPoint, I use it and love it. You have to wrestle with font AB>> size but after that it is OK. DC> Ummmm.... did you miss the part above where I said I was only interested DC> in Linux software? AB>> you won't need to qwk again. DC> I like using QWK, and the whole point of my questions is to find out if DC> operating as a Point would be any better. So far I've not seen any DC> indication of that. AB> I find your point comelling. I don't know what that sentence means. AB> What software do you use as a terminal to get the mail. I use Syncterm to log into my BBS and download a QWK packet, and then read/reply the packet using Offline Mail Reader software called Multimail. AB> I am very interested in that. Okay... It's quite easy and works great. .... System halted - Press all keys at once to continue. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115) .