Subj : Notice
To   : Bill McGarrity
From : Nicholas Boel
Date : Sun Feb 16 2014 20:38:14

Hello Bill,

On 16 Feb 14 13:43, Bill McGarrity wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> But if you're going to start any kind of FDN or hatch out any
 NB>> files, Tick and Tinytic (which doesn't even have a hatching
 NB>> ability) are definitely not up to par with the above mentioned.

 BM> Thanks so much for the info.  At this time I have no plans on
 BM> "hatching" but one never knows. I've looked at Allfix and being I run
 BM> Synchronet here, tinytic is the way to go for me as a tic processor as
 BM> it seems that's the only one that is compatable with the message base.
 BM> I even asked Rob if he had plans on interfacing a tic/filefind echo
 BM> response module and although he said it was an interesting idea, it
 BM> wasn't in the plans as of now.

No TIC processor needs to be compatible with Synchronet's message bases. With 
Allfix, HTick, and any others out there, you can set your announcement to 
announce to a text file, then use smbutil to post the message containing the 
contents of that text file, and using the addfiles utility to make sure the 
files get uploaded to the BBS filebases.

I use HTick with Synchronet here, and all works wonderfully.

If you ever feel the urge to give it a shot, I would gladly help you set it 
up, and share whatever configuration options I have in order to make it work 
smoothly alongside Synchronet with you.

As for any new feature requests towards Rob at the moment, I have a feeling 
they won't be acknowledged at the current time as he's busting ass on trying 
to get a new Win32 installer with the current stable Synchronet code, so there 
won't be a need to upgrade 3-4 times in order to get to the current state of 
things.

 NB>> Hope that helps!

 BM> Sure did.. thanks so much.

Of course! Your very welcome. :)

Regards,
Nick

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130910
 * Origin: Dark Sorrow | darksorrow.us (1:154/701)

.