Subj : Re: Nlcheck report
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Nodelist Police Commissioner
Date : Fri Feb 26 2021 13:38:48

Hello Michiel,

On 2021-02-26 12:46:01, you wrote to me:

 NC>> Removed:

 NC>> ,2880,Flipper_Mail_Station,Moscow,Alexander_Morozov,-Unpublished-,300,
 NC>> CM,MO,EMA:asm82ru@gmail.com ,1960,Count_Varg_Dipsysh,Moscow,Sergey_Zem
 NC>> sky,-Unpublished-,300,MO,CM,EMA:sergey.zemsky@gmail.com ,378,klug,Mosc
 NC>> ow,Mikhail_Markovskiy,-Unpublished-,300,EMA:klug@mail.ru ,961,cemehob,
 NC>> Moscow,Denis_Semenov,-Unpublished-,300,CM,EMA:mehob@yandex.ru ,614,Pir
 NC>> ates,Moscow,Slawa_Alexeew,-Unpublished-,300,CM,MO,IMI,EMA:P-Mail01@mai
 NC>> l.ru

 MvdV> So maybe these EMA nodes are not such a good idea after all?

I didn't check what changed. But now I did. The EMA: flag was just changed to an IMI: flag for those nodes. So they are still only "connectable" by email. But now you know what email encoding "protocol" to use, when you want to send them crashmail...

 NC>> New:

 NC>> ;E <Invalid Baud Rate>
 NC>> ,5013,Prison_Board,Mesquite_TX,Ruben_Figueroa,CM,XA,IBN:rdfig.net:2455
 NC>> 5,IVM:rdfig.net

 MvdV> I expect that will be fixed next week...

Or the not to distant future...

Regards, NPC.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.