Subj : Re: Weekly nodelist report on noteworthy changes (087)
To   : Wilfred van Velzen
From : Dan Clough
Date : Fri Mar 28 2025 11:54:31

-=> Wilfred van Velzen wrote to All <=-

 WvV> Hi All,

 WvV> Host,343,Xarxa_Catalana,Catalunya,Enric_Lleal_Serra,-Unpublished-,300,MO
 WvV> ,IBN,IFC,ITN,INA:net2343.fidonet.cat,U,Tce,NC

 WvV> The NC flag for a Host system is implied so not necessary.

 WvV> The IFC flag is new. On the default IFC port I get a 'Connection
 WvV> refused'.

 WvV> On the ITN port I directly get a login prompt for a "BBBS/Li6 v4.10
 WvV> Toy-7" bbs. I don't see an emsi string, so I'm not sure the ITN flag is
 WvV> valid.

 WvV> And BTW a bbs login prompt makes the MO flag invalid.

 WvV> And this node is no longer CM, but Tce, which is 02 to 04 UTC. Which is
 WvV> strange, because this system and 107 are aka's for the same system, and
 WvV> 107 has the CM flag. And I just got a IBN connect with this system
 WvV> outside the Tce hours.


 WvV> ,107,EYE_OF_THE_BEHOLDER_BBS,Badalona,Enric_Lleal_Serra,-Unpublished-,30
 WvV> 0,MO,CM,IBN,IFC,ITN,INA:fido.beholderbbs.org,U,NEC

 WvV> So the MO and IFC flags for this system are also invalid (since it's an
 WvV> AKA for 343/0. And the NEC flag in a 1 node net is kind of
 WvV> ridiculous...

 WvV> And BTW, nodes 120 and 136 in the same net are on Hold since 18 Aug
 WvV> 2024, which is "a bit" long for what is supposed to be a temporary
 WvV> situation...

So, to summarize, I think it would be safe to say that this guy (NC343) 
is a fucking idiot, and should be fired.



.... Ignorance can be cured.  Stupid is forever.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)

.