Subj : Nlcheck report
To   : Wilfred van Velzen
From : Stas Mishchenkov
Date : Sun Nov 10 2024 17:46:16

Hi Wilfred!

Wednesday November 06 2024 08:47, you wrote to me:

 SM>> 1:103/1
 SM>> ,1,bbsdev.net,Lake_Forest_CA,Stephen_Hurd,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XW,IBN
 SM>> Non Pvt node has no connection info.
 SM>> Am I right?

 WvV> No. The host name is in the system name. Of course it would be
 WvV> better/more clear to have it behind the IBN flag or as an INA. But this
 WvV> line is not wrong.

Thanks. Fixed. Is this documented or should it be documented?

 SM>> 1:214/0
 SM>> Host,214,San_Joaquin_Valley_Net,Visalia_CA,Ray_Quinn,1-559-429-8280,9600,
 SM>> C M,XX , V32b,IBN,INA:bbs.quinnnet.org Unknown flag 'V32b'. Mat mix case
 SM>> be used?

 WvV> FTS-5001 First defines it with a lower case 'b', but later in the
 WvV> document it is only mentiond with uppercase 'B'. The Z2 nodelist defines
 WvV> it with an uppercase 'B'. Errflags that Ward uses corrects it to
 WvV> uppercase 'B' (but there is a problem right now on Wards system with
 WvV> this). So it's unclear if both are correct, or that only the uppercase
 WvV> version should be used. FTS-5001 should be improved in my opinion: Either
 WvV> specifically allow both, or define it as all uppercase.

Thanks. Fixed.

 SM>> ,111,Byte_Ltd,Novosibirsk,Oleg_Redut,-Unpublished-,300,XA,MO,CM,#20,I
 SM>> BN,IFC,INA:fido.byte.ru,INA:byte.nsk.su,U,NC
 SM>> Flag 'CM' implies Mail Period
 SM>> Flags. Unknown flag '#20'. Am I right?

 WvV> No, But the CM flag and any #nn flag are mutually exclusive. So there is
 WvV> a problem, but your wording is wrong.

Ok. How it should be logged?
Flag '#20' not defined in FTS-5001.06. Am I right to recognize it as error?

Have a nice night.
          Stas Mishchenkov.

--- Have You daily sexual life? Hide it proper from Your wife! ;)
 * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)

.