Subj : Re: IP only nodes with ICM flag
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Tue Mar 05 2024 11:21:13

Hi Michiel,

On 2024-03-05 10:45:05, you wrote to All:

 MvdV> The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating
 MvdV> nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the
 MvdV> POTS/ISDN part.

 MvdV> See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.

 MvdV> The CM flag implies ICM; ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.

 MvdV> So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.

 MvdV> This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:

There are 4 nodes less in this list, compared to list published 3 days ago. Which is strange because these nodes are unchanged in the latest daily:

Host,226,Ohio_Net,Cuyahoga_Falls_OH,Drew_Klenotic,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IFC:5983,XA,INA:ftn.net226.org,IBN
,30,Freeside_BBS,Monroe_OH,Marty_Taylor,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XA,INA:freeside.bbs.io,IBN
,1701,Starfleet_HQ,Cuyahoga_Falls_OH,Drew_Klenotic,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IFC:5983,XA,INA:bbs.sfhqbbs.org,IBN
,200,Outpost_BBS,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XA,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFT,ITN:10123,IVM

These were the first 4 lines in the previous list, so it might be due to some editing error?


Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.1.1
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.