Subj : Re: IP only nodes with ICM flag
To   : All
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Sat Mar 02 2024 11:49:46

Hi All,

On 2024-03-02 10:24:15, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to you:

 MvdV> The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating
 MvdV> nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the
 MvdV> POTS/ISDN part.

 MvdV> See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.

 MvdV> The CM flag implies ICM; ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.

 MvdV> So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.

 MvdV> This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:

There is one less in this list then in the previous list:

,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XA,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFT,ITN:10123,IVM

Which is strange because it is still in then nodelist with the ICM flag present?


Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.1.1
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.