Subj : Re: Nlcheck report
To   : Carlos Navarro
From : Ward Dossche
Date : Sat Sep 23 2023 11:06:57

Carlos,
 
CN>MV> Also note that now all the anomalies are in Z2.
 
CN> I see most are EONs. IMHO those, as they are not Pvt, should at least
CN> carry a flag that specifies their e-mail transport method (IUC, IMI,
CN> ...).
 
+========================================================================+|
|                 E-mail-based transport media (rev. 18/9/2002)          ||
+========================================================================+|
|  EVY    Voyager-compatible                                             ||
|  EMA    Everything not defined by the aforementioned individual flags  ||
**************************************************************************|
! The flags described above need an e-mail address for resolving, it     !|
! should be provided immediately following the flag but separated by a   !|
! colon, example:                                                        !|
!                    <[flag]:xxx@zzz>                                    !|
!                                                                        !|
! If several flags share a single e-mail address then the IEM-, resp.    !|
! EMA-flag will be the advised location for the primary email address,   !|
! if technically possible.                                               !|
**************************************************************************|
 
 "EMA    Everything not defined by the aforementioned individual flags"
 
What is not clear about this ?
 
 \%/@rd

--- DB4 - 20230201
 * Origin: Many Glacier - Preserve / Protect / Conserve (2:292/854)

.