Subj : Re: Weekly nodelist report on noteworthy changes (097)
To   : Tommi Koivula
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Fri Apr 07 2023 18:15:41

Hi Tommi,

On 2023-04-07 18:43:40, you wrote to Stas Mishchenkov:

 WvV>>> Tested the TRACE function on 2:460/58 -> It works! ;)

 SM>> It works also at 2:460/0 with proper AKA in returning receipt
 SM>> message. ;)

 TK> Hmm.. I routed a ping message to 2:460/5858 via 2:460/0, but got the
 TK> pong/trace message from 2:460/58.

2:460/0 and 2:460/58 are AKA's on the same system. And you can't know the routed to address from the unpacked message sitting in the netmail directory. So only the tosser that unpacks the received message from the .pkt file knows where the message inside the .pkt file was routed to from the pkt header.

So if the PING/TRACE responder is a separate script, which seems to be the case for Stas's system, it would be hard to know what the routed to address was...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.