Subj : Re: Net 134
To   : Stas Mishchenkov
From : Wilfred van Velzen
Date : Thu Mar 09 2023 22:30:57

Hi Stas,

On 2023-03-09 17:52:18, you wrote to me:

 SM>>> Pvt nodes should be called without -i option if they have IBN flag.

 WvV>> Maybe Pvt should be treated the same as Down and Hold, when -i is
 WvV>> used or not?

 SM> The Hold and Down prefixes are ignored with the -i option. The Pvt prefix
 SM> is ignored in any case (with or without -i option) if there is information
 SM> to connect.

I know. But my suggestion was to treat the Pvt flag the same as Hold and Down in this regard.

 SM>>>  - Try to fix "read socket error".

 WvV>> We'll have to wait and see... ;)

 SM> Unfortunately, I do not know with which node I can now check this.

I get this with the latest and previous versions:

Calling 1:134/302 (172.105.106.228:24554)
Error Socket read error.

 SM> PPS: Is it worth trying to get the node address from binkp.net, for
 SM> example, if there is no other information in the nodelist for
 SM> connecting to the node, but the IBN flag is there?

There are probably very few nodes where this is the case, so I wouldn't put it on the top of your priority list! ;)

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
 * Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)

.